<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CCIE Lab &#187; Routing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ccielab.ro/category/ccnp/routing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ccielab.ro</link>
	<description>Cry in the Lab, Laugh in the Datacenter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 12:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>IP CEF</title>
		<link>http://ccielab.ro/2012/03/ip-cef/</link>
		<comments>http://ccielab.ro/2012/03/ip-cef/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marius Bunget</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccielab.ro/?p=185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CEF load balancing is based on a combination of  source and destination packet information. It allows you to optimize  resources by distributing traffic over multiple paths for transferring  data to a destination. You can configure load balancing on a  per-destination or per-packet basis. Load balancing decisions are made  on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>CEF load balancing is based on a combination of  source and destination packet information. It allows you to optimize  resources by distributing traffic over multiple paths for transferring  data to a destination. You can configure load balancing on a  per-destination or per-packet basis. Load balancing decisions are made  on the outbound interface. When you configure load balancing, configure  it on outbound interfaces. </span></p>
<p><span>Per-destination load balancing allows the router  to use multiple paths to achieve load sharing. Packets for a given  source-destination host pair are guaranteed to take the same path, even  if multiple paths are available. Traffic destined for different pairs  tend to take different paths. Per-destination load balancing is enabled  by default when you enable CEF.</span></p>
<p>To determine if CEF is enabled globally on a router, use the  commands <em><span>show ip cef</span></em> and <em><span>show ipv6 cef</span></em>. If it is not enabled by default, you  can turn it on globally using the command <em><span>ip  cef</span></em> for IPv4. To enable CEF for IPv6, first enable CEF for IPv4, then use  the command <em><span>ipv6 cef</span></em>. You can verify that CEF is enabled on an interface using the  commands <em><span>show cef interface</span> {interface}</em> and  <em><span>show ipv6 cef</span> {inte</em><em>rface} </em><span><em>detail</em></span>.</p>
<p>Topology</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="size-full wp-image-205 aligncenter" src="http://ccielab.ro/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/ccielab.png" alt="ip cef" width="267" height="105" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><span lang="en"><span>The routing table</span> <span>of</span> <span>router</span> <span>R2</span> <span>is</span> <span>similar to</span> <span>R1:</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left">R1#show ip route</p>
<p style="text-align: left">[...]</p>
<p style="text-align: left">C    192.168.12.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0<br />
1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets<br />
C       1.1.1.0 is directly connected, Loopback1<br />
2.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets<br />
S       2.2.2.0 [1/0] via 192.168.21.2<br />
[1/0] via 192.168.12.2<br />
C    192.168.21.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet1/0</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Check if CEF is enabled and show the forwarding information base (FIB) with information obtained from the  routing table.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">R1#show ip cef<br />
Prefix                    Next Hop                    Interface<br />
0.0.0.0/0           drop                              Null0 (default route handler entry)<br />
0.0.0.0/32         receive<br />
1.1.1.0/24           attached                      Loopback1<br />
1.1.1.0/32           receive<br />
1.1.1.1/32            receive<br />
1.1.1.255/32       receive<br />
2.2.2.0/24           192.168.21.2            FastEthernet1/0<br />
192.168.12.2            FastEthernet0/0</p>
<p style="text-align: left">[...]</p>
<p>Routers with default configuration perform Load Sharing per destination, also known as Fast Switching. Fast switching is the default IOS switching mode in some routers. The <em>debug ip packet</em> command displays process packets.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">R1#debug ip packet<br />
IP packet debugging is on<br />
R1#ping 2.2.2.2 repeat 1</p>
<p>Type escape sequence to abort.<br />
Sending 1, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:<br />
!<br />
Success rate is 100 percent (1/1), round-trip min/avg/max = 56/56/56 ms<br />
R1#<br />
*Mar  1 00:39:40.379: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.12.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via FIB<br />
*Mar  1 00:39:40.379: IP: s=192.168.12.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, sending<br />
*Mar  1 00:39:40.431: IP: tableid=0, s=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.12.1 (FastEthernet0/0), routed via RIB<br />
*Mar  1 00:39:40.431: IP: s=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet0/0), d=192.168.12.1 (FastEthernet0/0), len 100, rcvd 3<br />
R1#ping 2.2.2.2 repeat 1 so<br />
R1#ping 2.2.2.2 repeat 1 source loo 1</p>
<p>Type escape sequence to abort.<br />
Sending 1, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:<br />
<span>Packet sent with a source address of 1.1.1.1</span><br />
!<br />
Success rate is 100 percent (1/1), round-trip min/avg/max = 56/56/56 ms<br />
R1#<br />
*Mar  1 00:39:48.411: IP: tableid=0, s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet0/0), routed via FIB<br />
*Mar  1 00:39:48.411: IP: s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet0/0), len 100, sending<br />
*Mar  1 00:39:48.467: IP: tableid=0, s=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet1/0), d=1.1.1.1 (Loopback1), routed via RIB<br />
*Mar  1 00:39:48.467: IP: s=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet1/0), d=1.1.1.1, len 100, rcvd 4</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Note that for different source-destination pairs the outbound interface changes.</p>
<p style="text-align: left"><span lang="en"><span>Per packet </span></span><span lang="en"><span>Load Sharing configuration.</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left">R1(config)#int f 0/0<br />
R1(config-if)#no ip route-cache    //enable process switching<br />
R1(config-if)#ip load-sharing per-packet<br />
R1(config-if)#exit<br />
R1(config)#int f 1/0<br />
R1(config-if)#no ip route-cache<br />
R1(config-if)#ip load-sharing per-packet<br />
R1(config-if)#exit</p>
<p style="text-align: left">R1#sh cef interface fastEthernet 0/0<br />
[...]<br />
Per packet load-sharing is enabled<br />
[...]<br />
Fast switching type 1, interface type 18<br />
IP CEF switching disabled</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Verify per packet Load Sharing:</p>
<p style="text-align: left">R1#ping 2.2.2.2 source loopback 1 repeat 3</p>
<p>Type escape sequence to abort.<br />
Sending 3, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:<br />
Packet sent with a source address of 1.1.1.1<br />
!!!<br />
Success rate is 100 percent (3/3), round-trip min/avg/max = 16/37/52 ms<br />
R1#<br />
*Mar  1 01:00:35.419: IP: tableid=0, s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via FIB<br />
*Mar  1 01:00:35.419: IP: s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, sending<br />
!<br />
*Mar  1 01:00:35.467: IP: tableid=0, s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet0/0), routed via FIB<br />
*Mar  1 01:00:35.467: IP: s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet0/0), len 100, sending<br />
!<br />
*Mar  1 01:00:35.523: IP: tableid=0, s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via FIB<br />
*Mar  1 01:00:35.523: IP: s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, sending</p>
<p>When CEF is disabled all the packets are processed by the Routing Information Base (RIB) as shown below:</p>
<p style="text-align: left">R1(config)#no ip cef<br />
R1(config)#exit<br />
R1#clear ip cef * prefix-statistics<br />
R1#clear ip cef 2.2.2.2 prefix-statistics<br />
R1#ping 2.2.2.2 source loopback 1 repeat 2<br />
Type escape sequence to abort.<br />
Sending 2, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 2.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:<br />
Packet sent with a source address of 1.1.1.1<br />
!!<br />
Success rate is 100 percent (2/2), round-trip min/avg/max = 28/56/84 ms<br />
*Mar  1 01:07:07.475: IP: tableid=0, s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet0/0), routed via RIB<br />
*Mar  1 01:07:07.475: IP: s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet0/0), len 100, sending<br />
!<br />
*Mar  1 01:07:07.507: IP: tableid=0, s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet1/0), routed via RIB<br />
*Mar  1 01:07:07.507: IP: s=1.1.1.1 (local), d=2.2.2.2 (FastEthernet1/0), len 100, sending</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ccielab.ro/2012/03/ip-cef/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIP lab: Send RIP routes to remote neighbours</title>
		<link>http://ccielab.ro/2011/07/rip-lab-send-rip-routes-to-remote-neighbours/</link>
		<comments>http://ccielab.ro/2011/07/rip-lab-send-rip-routes-to-remote-neighbours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Juncu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco IOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neighbor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[routes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unicast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccielab.ro/?p=156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scenario:
You have two routers running RIP, but the two routers aren&#8217;t directly connected because there is a third router between them. See topology below. How do you get routes across because RIP only communicates with routers that are directly connected?

The simple answer is to create a GRE tunnel between R1 and R3 so a tun [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Scenario:</strong><br />
You have two routers running RIP, but the two routers aren&#8217;t directly connected because there is a third router between them. See topology below. How do you get routes across because RIP only communicates with routers that are directly connected?<br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-158" src="http://ccielab.ro/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/riplab1.png" alt="riplab" width="325" height="113" /></p>
<p>The simple answer is to create a GRE tunnel between R1 and R3 so a tun interface simulates a direct connection of the two routers. But let&#8217;s take a more didactic approach to remember some things about RIP.</p>
<p>RIP v2 sends the updates to the address 224.0.0.9 that is a local multicast address (TTL=1).  But there is another, very important in some situations (like some Frame Relay networks), way to send routes, and that is via unicast to a statically configured neighbor. Configuration is done via the <strong>neighbor</strong> command in the <strong>router rip</strong> configuration.  The routes will be encapsulated in normal IP unicast packets and since RIP runs on top of UDP, they should be routed as any other packet.</p>
<p><strong>R1:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>interface Serial0/0/1<br />
ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0<br />
interface Loopback 0<br />
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0<br />
router rip<br />
version 2<br />
passive-interface Loopback0<br />
network 10.0.0.0<strong><br />
network 192.168.0.0</strong><br />
<strong>neighbor 10.2.3.3</strong><br />
no auto-summary<strong> </strong></p></blockquote>
<p><strong>R3:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>interface Serial0/0/1<br />
ip address 10.2.3.3 255.255.255.0<br />
interface Loopback 0<br />
ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.255.0<br />
router rip<br />
version 2<br />
passive-interface Loopback0<br />
<strong>network 10.0.0.0</strong><br />
network 172.16.0.0<br />
<strong>neighbor 10.1.2.1</strong><br />
no auto-summary</p></blockquote>
<p>You still need to have a network command for the interfaces when you send and receive the updates (in this case 10.0.0.0) otherwise the received updates will be ignored.</p>
<p>First thing you should be careful of is the fact that R1 and R3 need layer3 communication. So you do need static routes for the R1 and R3 routers through R2.</p>
<p>Having connectivity between each other, the router starts sending unicast packets with the routes. debug ip rip would show the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>RIP: sending v2 update to 10.1.2.1 via Serial0/0/1 (10.2.3.3)<br />
RIP: build update entries<br />
172.16.0.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0</p></blockquote>
<p>Notice the update is sent to an unicast address and not 224.0.0.9.</p>
<p>Routes are received but they still are not in the routing tables. debug ip rip shows why:</p>
<blockquote><p>RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 10.2.3.3 on Serial0/0/1</p></blockquote>
<p>This reminds us of how RIP works: if a router receives an update it checks to see if the <strong>source</strong> of the packet is on the same subnet as the IP configured on the interface. If they don&#8217;t match, the update is ignored. In our case, the source of the updates are not on the same network because R2 does not modify the packet source/destination in any way.</p>
<p>The solution to this is to disable the default mechanism with the <strong>no validate-update-source</strong> command in the router rip configuration. This way any updates will be accepted.</p>
<p>Here is a wanted route in the routing table of R3:</p>
<blockquote><p>R    192.168.0.0/24 [120/1] via 10.1.2.1, 00:00:27</p></blockquote>
<p>Notice that the next hop is not directly connected so it need to do a recursive lookup and use the static route to send it to R2 first.</p>
<blockquote><p>S       10.1.2.1/32 [1/0] via 10.2.3.2</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ccielab.ro/2011/07/rip-lab-send-rip-routes-to-remote-neighbours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHCP Relay Server and NAT Case Study</title>
		<link>http://ccielab.ro/2010/08/dhcp-relay-server-and-nat-case-study/</link>
		<comments>http://ccielab.ro/2010/08/dhcp-relay-server-and-nat-case-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 17:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Juncu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boradcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debug ip packet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debup ip dhcp server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHCP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DHCP Relay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gateway IP Address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIADDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inside nat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ip helper-address]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unicast]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccielab.ro/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Topology:

Scenario:
The Host in the 192.168.0.0/24 network should get its IP address from a DHCP server.
Relay is the default router for the Host, but doesn&#8217;t have a DHCP service running. It will pass any DHCP requests from it&#8217; f1/0 interface to the DHCP server that has DHCP pools configured on it, using the &#8220;ip helper-addres&#8221; command.
Between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Topology:</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-144" src="http://ccielab.ro/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/dhcp_nat.png" alt="dhcp_nat" width="307" height="109" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify"><strong>Scenario:</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The <strong>Host</strong> in the 192.168.0.0/24 network should get its IP address from a DHCP server.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify"><strong>Relay</strong> is the default router for the <strong>Host</strong>, but doesn&#8217;t have a DHCP service running. It will pass any DHCP requests from it&#8217; f1/0 interface to the <strong>DHCP</strong> server that has <strong>DHCP pools</strong> configured on it, using the <strong>&#8220;ip helper-addres&#8221;</strong> command.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Between the <strong>DHCP</strong> router and the <strong>Relay</strong> router there is a public network, but behind <strong>Relay</strong>, there is a private network (<strong>Host</strong> is part of that network).  Relay will use <strong>NAT with overload</strong> (PAT) to service the private network.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify"><strong>Relay</strong> uses <strong>DHCP</strong> as it&#8217;s default route to the Internet, but DHCP doesn&#8217;t know about the private network in which <strong>Host</strong> is in (private networks shoudn&#8217;t be permitted to be accessed from the Internet).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify"><strong>Configurations:</strong></p>
<p>DHCP:</p>
<blockquote><p>ip dhcp pool DHCP_POOL<br />
network 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0<br />
default-router 192.168.0.1</p>
<p>interface FastEthernet0/0<br />
ip address 200.0.0.1 255.255.255.0</p></blockquote>
<p>Relay:</p>
<blockquote><p>interface FastEthernet0/0<br />
ip address 200.0.0.100 255.255.255.0<br />
ip nat outside</p>
<p>interface FastEthernet1/0<br />
ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0<br />
ip helper-address 200.0.0.1<br />
ip nat inside</p>
<p>ip nat inside source list NAT_HOSTS interface FastEthernet0/0 overload</p>
<p>ip access-list standard NAT_HOSTS<br />
permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.0.255</p></blockquote>
<p>Host:</p>
<blockquote><p>interface FastEthernet1/0<br />
ip address dhcp</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Problem:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Relay</strong> will receive a DHCP request (broadcast) on F1/0 interface. Because of the &#8220;<strong>ip helper-address</strong>&#8220;, <strong>Relay</strong> will transform the request from broadcast to unicast and send it to the <strong>DHCP</strong> router. The  DHCP request will reach the router, it will assign  an IP from the pool, but the reply will never reach <strong>Host</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Explenation:</strong></p>
<p>Using &#8220;<strong>debug ip dhcp server events</strong>&#8220;, &#8220;<strong>debug ip dhcp server packet</strong>&#8221; and &#8220;<strong>debug ip packet</strong>&#8220;, we can find out the problem.</p>
<p>The first thing that could come to mind is the fapt that if <strong>Relay</strong> receives a packet on F1/0 interface (192.168.0.1) it will send an unicast message with the source IP address of that interface and a destination address of the ip-helper server. This is not true. The relayed request is considered to be generated by the local router (<strong>Relay</strong>). This means that the source IP address of the relayed request is that of the outgoing interface to the DHCP Server. Here is the <strong>debug ip packet</strong> output:</p>
<blockquote><p>*Mar  1 02:33:23.127: IP: tableid=0, s=200.0.0.100 (FastEthernet0/0), d=200.0.0. 1 (FastEthernet0/0), routed via RIB</p></blockquote>
<p>If  the source address of the IP packet does not have an IP address from the 192.168.0.0/24 network, how does the DHCP Server know from witch pool to give out a free address. The answer is a field in the DHCP protocol, called GIADDR (Gateway IP Address). The value of this field will be the IP address of the interface in the private network.</p>
<p>The problem is that after the DHCP server chooses an IP from the pool, it will reply to the unicast request, with another unicast packet that has the destination IP the GIADDR, not the source address of the request. The output from <strong>debug ip dhcp server events:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>*Mar  1 03:13:33.719: DHCPD: DHCPDISCOVER received from client 0063.6973.636f.2d 63.6330.322e.3035.6230.2e30.3031.302d.4661.312f.30 through relay 192.168.0.1.<br />
*Mar  1 03:13:33.731: DHCPD: Sending DHCPOFFER to client 0063.6973.636f.2d63.6330.322e.3035.6230.2e30.3031.302d.4661.312f.30 (192.168.0.2).<br />
*Mar  1 03:13:33.731: DHCPD: unicasting BOOTREPLY for client cc02.05b0.0010 to relay 192.168.0.1</p></blockquote>
<p>The <strong>DHCP</strong> router doesn&#8217;t know about the 192.168.0.0/24 network because that is a private network behind a NAT.</p>
<p>A solution to the situation is to add a static route on the <strong>DHCP</strong> router to the private network. But this would ruin the purpose of NAT. A better solution is to avoid the scenario by design (still, the situation could come up in lab environments and you should now know why it behaves the way it does)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ccielab.ro/2010/08/dhcp-relay-server-and-nat-case-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frame Relay Switching</title>
		<link>http://ccielab.ro/2010/07/frame-relay-switching/</link>
		<comments>http://ccielab.ro/2010/07/frame-relay-switching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 08:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Juncu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HowTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frame Relay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frame Relay Switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inverse ARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LMI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccielab.ro/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frame Relay is still very much a popular subject in exams, labs and in the real networks.
Any lab with topologies that run different protocols over FR must start with the layer 2 configuration of the Frame Relay switched network. FR Topologies like full mesh or hub and spoke require a Frame Relay Switch. A FR [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify"><strong>Frame Relay</strong> is still very much a popular subject in exams, labs and in the real networks.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Any lab with topologies that run different protocols over FR must start with the layer 2 configuration of the Frame Relay switched network. FR Topologies like full mesh or hub and spoke require a <strong>Frame Relay Switch. </strong>A FR Switch is a normal router but specifically configured to do Frame Relay switching.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify">First of all, we need to tell the router to start switching Frame Relay traffic. From global configuration mode we need to issue the <strong>frame-relay switching </strong>command.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">Then, on the interfaces to Frame Relay clients, we need to start sending keepalives (LMIs) by configuring the interface as DCE with the <strong>frame-relay intf-type dce</strong> command.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The last thing that the FR Switch needs to do is to route DLCI on the virtual cicuits. This is done to tell an interface where to put a received frame with a DLCI. The frame will be put on another interface with another DLCI.  The configuration is done per interface with the <strong>frame-relay route</strong> command. The command requires that you specify the incoming  DLCI, on which the switching decision will be maide, the outgoing interface, and the DLCI with which the frame will be sent (&#8221;freame-relay route IN_DLCI OUT_INT OUT_DLCI&#8221;).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">If Inverse ARP is not disabled on the FR Switch, no DLCI-IP mappings will be required.</p>
<p><strong>Topology:</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-127" src="http://ccielab.ro/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/fr_sw.png" alt="fr_sw" width="392" height="85" /></p>
<p><strong>Configuration:</strong></p>
<p>R1(config)#int s0/0<br />
R1(config-if)#no shut<br />
R1(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay<br />
R1(config-if)#clock rate 128000<br />
R1(config-if)#ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0</p>
<p>R2(config)#int s0/0<br />
R2(config-if)#no shut<br />
R2(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay<br />
R2(config-if)#clock rate 128000<br />
R2(config-if)#ip address 10.1.2.2 255.255.255.0</p>
<p>FR-Sw(config)#frame-relay switching<br />
FR-Sw(config)#int s0/1<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#no shut<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#clock rate 128000<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#frame-relay intf-type dce<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#frame-relay route 102 interface s0/0 201<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#int s0/0<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#no shut<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#clock rate 128000<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#frame-relay intf-type dce<br />
FR-Sw(config-if)#frame-relay route 201 interface s0/1 102</p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong>Running Configurations:</strong></p>
<p><strong>R1:</strong></p>
<p>interface Serial0/0<br />
ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0<br />
encapsulation frame-relay<br />
clockrate 128000<br />
no fair-queue<br />
end</p>
<p><strong>R2:</strong></p>
<p>interface Serial0/0<br />
ip address 10.1.2.2 255.255.255.0<br />
encapsulation frame-relay<br />
clockrate 128000<br />
no fair-queue<br />
end</p>
<p><strong>FR-Sw:</strong></p>
<p>interface Serial0/0<br />
no ip address<br />
encapsulation frame-relay<br />
no fair-queue<br />
frame-relay intf-type dce<br />
frame-relay route 201 interface Serial0/1 102<br />
end</p>
<p>interface Serial0/1<br />
no ip address<br />
encapsulation frame-relay<br />
frame-relay intf-type dce<br />
frame-relay route 102 interface Serial0/0 201<br />
end</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ccielab.ro/2010/07/frame-relay-switching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back-to-back Frame Relay</title>
		<link>http://ccielab.ro/2010/07/back-to-back-frame-relay/</link>
		<comments>http://ccielab.ro/2010/07/back-to-back-frame-relay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 07:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Juncu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HowTo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[back-to-back]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLCI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FR Switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frame Relay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inverse ARP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keepalive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccielab.ro/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the simplest use of a Frame Relay encapsulation and it&#8217;s  between two routers, without a Frame Relay Switch. PPP or HDLC  would make more sense to use in these types of links, but it is useful  in labs.
In a back-to-back scenario is important to remember what the FR  Switch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify">This is the simplest use of a Frame Relay encapsulation and it&#8217;s  between two routers, <strong>without a Frame Relay Switch</strong>. PPP or HDLC  would make more sense to use in these types of links, but it is useful  in labs.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">In a back-to-back scenario is important to remember what the FR  Switch should be doing: being the DCE and sending the keepalives to  maintain the layer 2 link to the client router. Because of the fact that  no FR Switch is present, the lack of keepalives being sent must be ignored using the &#8220;<strong>no  keepalive</strong>&#8221; command. Also, Inverse ARP won&#8217;t work, so manual IP-DLCI  mapping will be needed.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify">The FR Switch should be the one doing swapping of DLCIs on the network so the frames arrive at their destination with the correctly mapped DLCIs. In this case, we will need to have the same DLCI set in the manual mapping so the routers match entries in the mappings.</p>
<p><strong>The topology:</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-124" src="http://ccielab.ro/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/fr_b2b.png" alt="fr_b2b" width="375" height="126" /></p>
<p><strong>Configuration:</strong></p>
<p>R1(config)#int s0/1<br />
R1(config-if)#no shut<br />
R1(config-if)#clock rate 128000<br />
R1(config-if)#ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0<br />
R1(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay<br />
R1(config-if)#frame-relay map ip 10.1.2.2 42<br />
R1(config-if)#no keepalive</p>
<p>R2(config)#int s0/1<br />
R2(config-if)#no shut<br />
R2(config-if)#clock rate 128000<br />
R2(config-if)#ip address 10.1.2.2 255.255.255.0<br />
R2(config-if)#encapsulation frame-relay<br />
R2(config-if)#frame-relay map ip 10.1.2.1 42<br />
R2(config-if)#no keepalive</p>
<p><strong>Running configurations:</strong></p>
<p><strong>R1:</strong></p>
<p>interface Serial0/1<br />
ip address 10.1.2.1 255.255.255.0<br />
encapsulation frame-relay<br />
no keepalive<br />
clockrate 128000<br />
frame-relay map ip 10.1.2.2 42<br />
end</p>
<p><strong>R2:</strong></p>
<p>interface Serial0/1<br />
ip address 10.1.2.2 255.255.255.0<br />
encapsulation frame-relay<br />
no keepalive<br />
frame-relay map ip 10.1.2.1 42<br />
end</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ccielab.ro/2010/07/back-to-back-frame-relay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IPv6 Case Study: RIPng and usage of link local address</title>
		<link>http://ccielab.ro/2009/11/ipv6-case-study-ripng-and-usage-of-link-local-address/</link>
		<comments>http://ccielab.ro/2009/11/ipv6-case-study-ripng-and-usage-of-link-local-address/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Juncu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CCNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Routing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPv6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIPng]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ccielab.ro/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simple topology: two routers, connected via a (serial) link, each with a loopback interface configured on it.
Loopback 0 on R1 has the IP 2001:A::1/64 and Loopback 0 on R2 has the IP 2001:B::1/64.  We want to make R1 aware of the 2001:B::0/64 network and R2 aware of the 2001:A::0/64 network. RIPng would be the the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple topology: two routers, connected via a (serial) link, each with a loopback interface configured on it.</p>
<p>Loopback 0 on R1 has the IP <strong>2001:A::1/64</strong> and Loopback 0 on R2 has the IP <strong>2001:B::1/64</strong>.  We want to make R1 aware of the 2001:B::0/64 network and R2 aware of the 2001:A::0/64 network. <strong>RIPng </strong>would be the the easiest way of doing that.</p>
<p>First we need to enable<strong> IPv6 unicast routing</strong>, and then start the RIP process on the interfaces.</p>
<blockquote><p>R1(config)#ipv6 unicast-routing<br />
R1(config)#ipv6 router rip SIMPLE_RIP<br />
R1(config)#interface lo0<br />
R1(config-if)#ipv6 address 2001:A::1/64<br />
R1(config-if)#ipv6 rip SIMPLE_RIP enable</p>
<p>R2(config)#ipv6 unicast-routing<br />
R2(config)#ipv6 router rip SIMPLE_RIP<br />
R2(config)#interface lo0<br />
R2(config-if)#ipv6 address 2001:B::1/64<br />
R2(config-if)#ipv6 rip SIMPLE_RIP enable</p></blockquote>
<p>We also need to activate the RIP process on the transit link and make the interface IPv6 enabled.</p>
<blockquote><p>R1(config)#interface s0/1/1</p>
<p>R1(config-if)#ipv6 rip SIMPLE_RIP enable</p>
<p>R1(config-if)#ipv6 enable</p>
<p>R2(config)#interface s0/1/1</p>
<p>R2(config-if)#ipv6 enable</p>
<p>R2(config-if)#ipv6 rip SIMPLE_RIP enable</p></blockquote>
<p>As it can be noticed, we haven&#8217;t configured a global IPv6 address on the interface, yet, RIP will do it&#8217;s job.</p>
<blockquote><p>R2#sh ipv6 route<br />
IPv6 Routing Table &#8211; 5 entries<br />
Codes: C &#8211; Connected, L &#8211; Local, S &#8211; Static, R &#8211; RIP, B &#8211; BGP<br />
U &#8211; Per-user Static route<br />
I1 &#8211; ISIS L1, I2 &#8211; ISIS L2, IA &#8211; ISIS interarea, IS &#8211; ISIS summary<br />
O &#8211; OSPF intra, OI &#8211; OSPF inter, OE1 &#8211; OSPF ext 1, OE2 &#8211; OSPF ext 2<br />
ON1 &#8211; OSPF NSSA ext 1, ON2 &#8211; OSPF NSSA ext 2<br />
D &#8211; EIGRP, EX &#8211; EIGRP external<br />
<strong>R   2001:A::/64 [120/2]<br />
via FE80::219:E8FF:FEF2:8F3A, Serial0/1/1</strong><br />
C   2001:B::/64 [0/0]<br />
via ::, Loopback0<br />
L   2001:B::1/128 [0/0]<br />
via ::, Loopback0<br />
L   FE80::/10 [0/0]<br />
via ::, Null0<br />
L   FF00::/8 [0/0]<br />
via ::, Null0</p></blockquote>
<p>The reason why it works, it&#8217;s a <strong>link local address</strong>, which is automatically configured once you turn on IPv6 on the interface. If the command &#8220;(config-if)#ipv6 enable&#8221; would have been missing, there would have been no exchange of routes.</p>
<p>Let us now analyze a possible misconfiguration. Let&#8217;s configure a global address on the link. What first comes to mind is IPv4 rule that stated that the serial interface of each router has to be configured in the same broadcast domain.  We will configure the serial interface on R1 with 2001:C::1/64 and serial interface on R2 with 2001:D::1/64 (clearly in different subnets).</p>
<blockquote><p>R1#show ipv6 interface serial 0/1/1<br />
Serial0/1/1 is up, line protocol is up<br />
IPv6 is enabled, link-local address is FE80::219:E8FF:FEF2:8F3A<br />
No Virtual link-local address(es):<br />
<strong>Global unicast address(es):<br />
2001:C::1, subnet is 2001:C::/64</strong></p>
<p>R2#show ipv6 interface serial 0/1/1<br />
Serial0/1/1 is up, line protocol is up<br />
IPv6 is enabled, link-local address is FE80::21A:2FFF:FE2A:2118<br />
No Virtual link-local address(es):<br />
<strong>Global unicast address(es):<br />
2001:D::1, subnet is 2001:D::/64</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Even if we don&#8217;t have the two routers in the same subnet from the global address perspective, they are in the same broadcast domain from the link local address point of view. The traffic will still be routed via the link local address, because it&#8217;s actually &#8220;closer&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>R   2001:A::/64 [120/2]<br />
via FE80::219:E8FF:FEF2:8F3A, Serial0/1/1</p></blockquote>
<p>So, if your routes are flowing when you are thinking that they shouldn&#8217;t, you might want to remember the link local address.</p>
<p>Thanks go out to BogdanD for help with case study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ccielab.ro/2009/11/ipv6-case-study-ripng-and-usage-of-link-local-address/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

